Sanyan finance today found that the apology letter issued by Chen, the owner of Wenzhou Tesla out of control, on his microblog has disappeared. In this regard, according to Sina Technology, Tesla China responded that the terms of enforcement did not explicitly require a specific release deadline. According to Phoenix auto, a recording showed that Wenzhou car owners had been told that if they did not issue a letter of apology, they would be detained and fined 20000 yuan. This may be an important reason why Wenzhou car owners changed their words several times and triggered an apology letter.
However, in response to Tesla's "no deadline requirement", Han Chao, the owner of Tesla's "one refund and three compensation" case, believes that it is very far fetched.
Han Chao said that it is more appropriate to say that this is a public relations article than an apology letter. The title of an apology letter is "all netizens". May I ask the agent whether this letter is an apology to Tesla or to netizens, or the purpose is not an apology at all.
Han Chao also exposed the suspected chat content with Wenzhou car owners. The chat screenshot shows that Wenzhou car owners were asked why Han Chao and other car owners were mentioned in the content of the apology letter. The car owner stressed that "there was no addition, but it was drafted", "I never thought to implicate you", and said that "if I don't sign like this, I can't even go home, and I didn't say you".
For Tesla's previous emphasis on the statement that "the content is true, the procedure is proper, and the owner is voluntary", Han Chao questioned, "have a good look at the chat content? Does it have anything to do with these words you mentioned? In addition to showing the helplessness of a civilian, I really can't see the so-called" true, legitimate, voluntary '".
However, what makes people curious is, why did the owner of Wenzhou delete the apology letter? Is it active or passive?
What do you think of this?