According to tianyancha app, recently, Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and Cai Jia announced that the plaintiff was Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., and the relevant case will be heard in Ningbo intermediate people's Court of Zhejiang Province on June 1**
According to media reports, Cai Jia, the car critic "boss Cai", said not long ago that he had received Tesla's indictment for the second time. Tesla claimed 5million yuan and demanded a public apology. It is reported that "boss Cai" disclosed in a video in 2021 that a friend of his was one of Tesla's suppliers. After localization, Tesla adopted such means as lowering the quotation, strict payment settlement or cycle to suppliers, which may cause problems in the quality of suppliers' products. At the same time, Tesla's personnel in charge of inspection and suppliers' personnel have such behaviors as "taking a card".
Event review:
Tesla sued millions of fans for "big V"! Ask for a public apology and claim 5million yuan
Source: hexun.com
Recently, according to the auto we media and auto reviewer "boss Cai", he received the indictment of civil litigation cases sent by Tesla and the relevant documents delivered to him after the court accepted the case. Tesla claimed 5million yuan and demanded a public apology.
Statistics show that "boss Cai" is a car reviewer who mainly interprets the professional content of cars. He has more than 2million fans on a video platform. With the characteristics of daring to tell the truth and strong professionalism, he has a large number of fans, and has a certain influence in the car review industry.
It is reported that Tesla sued the car critic "boss Cai" (real name: Cai Jia) for infringing his company's reputation** From the content of the disclosed indictment, Tesla filed four claims to the court:
Including requiring the defendant to stop infringing and delete the infringing content;
Require the defendant to make a public written apology to the plaintiff and hold the top position on the relevant platform for no less than 90 days
Require the defendant to pay 5million yuan of infringement damages to the plaintiff
The defendant is required to bear the litigation costs of the case.
"Boss Cai" said that this was the second time Tesla sued itself. Tesla sued itself last year but was rejected by the court. This time, Tesla sued itself again with "a higher-level parent company" as the plaintiff.
In 2021, "boss Cai" released a video with the theme of "a Tesla supplier friend of mine exposed relevant secrets" through a video platform.
"Boss Cai" broke the news in this video that a friend of his is one of Tesla's suppliers, Tesla has taken such measures as lowering the quotation, strict payment settlement or cycle against the supplier after localization, and this may cause problems in the supplier's product quality, at the same time, Tesla's personnel in charge of inspection and the supplier's personnel have "taken a card" and other behaviors**
Tesla has complained about the above content because there is no evidence to prove the authenticity of the above content. While "boss Cai" said that the above content belonged to the disclosure of a friend, but he could not ask this "friend" to testify in court for himself.
In addition, "boss Cai" did not understand Tesla's request for "compensation of 5million yuan". He believes that Tesla has no relevant evidence to prove that its content caused a loss of 5million yuan to it, but such a high claim object will increase the response cost , for example, lawyer fees are charged according to the object of the case.
In response to the video content released by him, "boss Cai" said that Tesla did not investigate at the first time. Instead, it was the person who complained and prosecuted the exposure, " many large companies are in the environment of public opinion and media (supervision). As such a large company, can't you really say any defects? I can't fight you in terms of strength, but I will accompany the prosecution to the end."
Since the establishment of Tesla's legal department in May last year, it has sent lawyer letters or sued many media, we media or car owners for high claims, the amount of claims in some civil litigation cases is about 5million yuan**
In September last year, Tesla company sued Mr. Han, the owner of the "one refund and three compensation" case, and claimed that Ms. Henan women's rights protection car infringed on her reputation, claiming 5.05 million yuan and 5million yuan respectively, and asked for a public apology;
In October last year, Tesla company sued the owner of Wenzhou Tesla for infringing the right of reputation, and some won the lawsuit. The owner of the defendant was sentenced to compensate Tesla company 50000 yuan and made a public apology;
In January this year, Tesla sued the famous car reviewer "Xiaogang senior";
In February this year, Tesla company sued the driver on behalf of Tesla company for violating the right of reputation, and some of them won the lawsuit. The defendant driver on behalf of Tesla company was sentenced to pay 20000 yuan to Tesla company and made a public apology.
What do you think of the chess game between boss CAI and Tesla?