In the CPU market, AMD's sharp dragon has made friends suffer. In the graphics card market, amd has also been on track with rDNA graphics cards in recent years. However, compared with NVIDIA, it does not have an advantage on the whole and is temporarily down. How to persuade players to buy AMD's radeon graphics card? Now Frank Azor, AMD's chief game architect, gives a strong reason, that is, the cost performance of a card is higher, even 89% higher than that of N card, and the advantage is very obvious.
In the comparison published by Frank Azor, amd not only compares the performance, price and power consumption gap between a card and N card, but also introduces two indicators for comprehensive evaluation, one is cost performance, that is perf / $, and the other is FPS / watt, which can be understood as energy consumption ratio**
Amd divided the two graphics cards into four levels: 1080 medium image quality, 1080p highest image quality, 1440p highest image quality and 4K highest image quality. The cost performance and energy consumption ratio data of different levels of graphics cards were compared.
In this chart, in the comparison between the flagship RX 6950 XT and RTX 3090, the cost performance of a card is 80% higher, and the energy consumption is 22% higher. In other graphics cards, the cost performance is less than 8%, and more than 50%.
The highest gap is RX 6400 XT. Compared with GTX 1050 Ti, the cost performance of a card is 89% higher and the energy consumption ratio is 122% higher, taking the lead in all aspects
