Recently, Mr. Huang, a fruit trader in Jiangjin, Chongqing, mistakenly transferred the payment of 30000 yuan to a new customer. After receiving the money, the other party quickly blackmailed Mr. Huang. Mr. Huang said that the other party was a young man in his twenties. He had bought fruit a few days ago. Now the other party's wechat avatar, nickname and wechat have been changed, so he can't be contacted. The lawyer suggested that Mr. Huang could report the case to the police and take judicial proceedings if no agreement could be reached through consultation.
Access:
For the above problems, some lawyers and bloggers also gave their own views. Wechat avatars and nicknames can always be changed at will, and the bound mobile phone number can also be changed. Before that, it is necessary to confirm that the identity of a wechat user is the user name. Even the user name of wechat can be changed. How can the litigant be determined in case of such a dispute**
I tried the transfer function of wechat. For the small partners who have transferred money to each other before, 50000 does not need to verify their names.
For those who have not posted before, but have a long chat time, 50000 do not need to verify their names.
For those who haven't posted before and haven't spoken for a long time after adding, 50000 people need to verify their names, and some don't.
For those who have just added a few days and haven't posted, 50000 needs to verify their names.
Therefore, he reasonably suspects that the big data security mechanism of wechat is that if two people have had transfer records before, there is no need to verify them. If there is no transfer record, but the payee often receives that the transfer has been verified by others, there is no need to verify it?
