These two days, the "earthquake" incident in the car circle is nothing more than the public apology of Wenzhou owner Mr. Chen. Mr. Chen, the Wenzhou owner who had previously accused Tesla of "brake failure", issued a letter of apology on his personal account, admitting that he had fabricated "Tesla brake failure and automatic acceleration" and made an apology to Tesla;
At the same time, the owner also revealed that when he carried out the above-mentioned acts, the "owner surnamed Feng" in Shanghai contacted him and introduced him to a platform. The platform arranged special lawyers for him and contracted all expenses.
Moreover, Ms. Henan car advocate and Mr. Han, the owner of Tianjin, also contacted him; During this period, Ms. Zhang invited him to write a joint book on class action, but she was refused.
Due to the huge amount of information, it immediately attracted the attention of all parties, and many people have more doubts about Mr. Han in Tianjin and Ms. Zhang in Henan.
In response to this matter, Ms. Zhang of Henan roof rights protection made a response for the first time in the morning of May 10, and in the afternoon of that day, she publicly responded again (Video) 。
First of all, according to Mr. Chen Junyi, the owner of Wenzhou, the apology letter was written by Tesla.
Your apology or compromise is between you and Tesla. Why do you throw dirty water on me? Why involve people outside the case who have nothing to do with the case? Tesla wrote a letter of apology and asked you to release it? What is your real intention that you agree to release? What is the heart of residence? Can you live with your conscience about safeguarding rights and bewitching?
First, on March 10, 2021, Chen Junyi took the initiative to add my wechat, claiming to be the runaway owner of Tesla Wenzhou, and the accident was the most serious. He took the initiative to provide a phone call and a red envelope of 100 yuan. I hope I can provide assistance in safeguarding rights. I refused the red envelope and said we were all victims. You're welcome. And comforted him.
Second, when Chen Junyi met him, he began to protect his rights independently and went to the 315 scene in Hangzhou. I also told him to be as objective as possible and deal with the matter as it is. Legal, reasonable and rational rights protection.
Third, Chen Junyi once said: Tesla is too bad. He asked the Wenzhou automobile engineering society to write the appraisal, which was written as that he stepped on the switch by mistake. Because if you don't say so, the insurance company won't settle the claim. The original words are: "I asked him to write, but I couldn't help it at that time". The reason he said was: "several neighbors next door who were hit by a car come to me every day and ask me to lose money".
Fourth, on March 29, 2022, I only asked him through wechat: do you participate in the joint book of class action owners? He replied: the original judgment was upheld in the second instance, but it can't be done or not.
As we all know, class action is one of the forms of legal rights protection at home and abroad. Is it wrong to discuss legal rights protection among rights protection owners? If a kind inquiry constitutes demagoguery, what is Tesla's statement of apology?
Fifth, Mr. Chen, the owner of Wenzhou, has been safeguarding his rights independently from beginning to end and has taken the initiative to seek help from me. Now, after losing the second instance, he actually bit back at his "comrades in arms" who had helped him and attacked me with the statement written by Tesla for him. Who bewitched him?
Mr. Chen Junyi, the owner of Wenzhou, what do you mean by the word "bewitching and blinding"? Who bewitched you? Please show me the evidence! Otherwise, you are planting a frame and maliciously distorting the facts! Waiting for you will be another legal sanction!
At the same time, I would also like to warn those who write this letter that you are the initiator of trying to confuse public opinion and confuse black and white.
In addition, Ms. Zhang also issued a lawyer's statement, requiring Wenzhou car owners to unconditionally delete the untrue remarks about Ms. Zhang, immediately stop the infringement and make a public apology.
